Judge refuses protection to child at great risk
Follow & like us
Wow. As Executive Director of Court Watch, a lot of articles come
Court Watch Montgomery has a new report out – and the news
Numerous “best practices” were on display in domestic violence criminal court yesterday.
Connect With Us
FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
Follow Court Watch Montgomery on twitter and keep updated.FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
JOIN US ON FACEBOOK
Get latest updates about Court Watch Montgomery on facebook.JOIN US ON FACEBOOK
BECOME A VOLUNTEER
Join hands with us and make a difference in the life of domestic violence victims.BECOME A VOLUNTEER
MAKE A DONATION
Your donations will help us expand & improve our reach.MAKE A DONATION
A District Court judge handling protective orders in November listened as a petitioner told her story. The petitioner described how her partner attacked and strangled her while she was holding their young child in her arms. He strangled her again on the bed, with the child lying right next to them. The respondent’s actions put the child in great danger and show a reckless disregard for the child’s well being.
Judges have the power — and the obligation — to protect children as they formulate protective orders initiated by an abused parent. Judges can order a Child Protective Services assessment to gather needed information. They can explicitly include the child in the protective order. They can limit contact with violent parents and set custody in a way that ensures the child’s safety.
In this case, a Child Protective Services investigation was clearly warranted — but the judge did not order one. In addition, the judge refused to include the child in the temporary protective order which she granted to the mother. The judge stated that she was “not getting involved with child custody.”
The Maryland Judge’s Domestic Violence Resource Manual specifically states that judges should not refuse to consider custody decisions in protective orders simply because that issue may be dealt with later in a Circuit Court custody or divorce case.
This judge had a responsibility to ensure the basic safety of a vulnerable child. She failed to meet her obligation.
Posted by Laurie Duker on Wednesday, December 14th, 2016 @ 11:00PM
Categories: Children in violent homes, Demeanor in court, Judges, News
Tags: children, domestic violence, judges, Maryland, Montgomery County, protective orders